Meritocracy faces criticism, often deemed a flawed system that needs transformation rather than abandonment. Properly implemented, it can align the most deserving individuals with influential roles, fostering fairness. Reform hinges on a broader understanding of merit that encompasses character traits like integrity and empathy, moving beyond capabilities alone.
Making merit-based decisions is complex due to ingrained biases in evaluators that can distort assessments. Organizations often exhibit double standards that undermine meritocracy, perpetuating skepticism among those held to higher criteria. Implementing a transparent and systematic approach to character evaluation, which includes formal definitions and employee training, is essential to restoring meritocracy.
Integrating character into merit-based systems necessitates clear communication and ongoing training aligned with organizational values. While subjective, character assessments can be made fair with proper methods, including third-party evaluations. Emphasizing character is crucial for leadership effectiveness and organizational integrity, reducing risks linked to poor character in authority roles. Reforms in meritocracy, if executed well, promise advantages for organizations and society alike.
👉 Pročitaj original: MIT Sloan Management Review
