Organizations today are grappling with the overwhelming challenge of managing numerous security tools, often reaching as many as 25 different systems. This proliferation of tools can lead to confusion and inefficiency, as security teams struggle to interpret the myriad of alerts generated. While some teams are resorting to creating their own security data lakes to integrate these tools, this DIY approach comes with its own set of pitfalls that can distract from their primary goal of mitigating cyber risk.
One of the major risks associated with a DIY exposure management strategy is the hidden costs that can arise. What may seem like a ‘free’ solution can escalate into significant investments in infrastructure and expertise. Furthermore, the lack of consistency and data quality issues inherent in custom solutions can result in inaccurate risk assessments and a less effective security posture. Relying on infrequent snapshots of data can provide a false sense of security, as attackers continuously exploit vulnerabilities that organizations may not even be aware of due to delayed analysis.
Ultimately, to effectively manage exposure to threats, organizations must recognize the limitations of a DIY approach. Continuous assessment and the adoption of modern threat and exposure management platforms can drastically improve visibility and responsiveness to cyber threats. As many organizations still underestimate the value these platforms provide, it is crucial for them to rethink their strategies to prioritize efficient and proactive risk management.
👉 Pročitaj original: Tenable Research
