Crash Tests for Security: Why BAS Is Proof of Defense, Not Assumptions

Source: The Hacker News

Car manufacturers have long relied on crash tests to ensure their vehicles can withstand real-world impacts. These tests validate design specifications and provide insights that theoretical models can’t. Similarly, in the field of cybersecurity, organizations face overwhelming amounts of data regarding vulnerabilities, yet these alerts do not necessarily correlate with actual security resilience. To substantiate their security postures, organizations must engage in proactive testing measures that evaluate their systems under realistic attack scenarios.

Risk management in cybersecurity cannot be merely derived from compliance checks or automatic alerts. Just as a car may pass all theoretical safety criteria yet fail miserably in a real crash, businesses can also be blindsided by sophisticated cyber threats despite appearing compliant on paper. Organizations must look beyond surface-level metrics and invest in continuous penetration testing and breach simulations to understand their vulnerabilities better. By embracing this rigorous testing culture, the potential fallout from cyber attacks can be significantly mitigated, ultimately protecting not just data but also reputation and stakeholder trust.

👉 Pročitaj original: The Hacker News